• Home
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Special Offers
Business Intelligence Info
  • Business Intelligence
    • BI News and Info
    • Big Data
    • Mobile and Cloud
    • Self-Service BI
  • CRM
    • CRM News and Info
    • InfusionSoft
    • Microsoft Dynamics CRM
    • NetSuite
    • OnContact
    • Salesforce
    • Workbooks
  • Data Mining
    • Pentaho
    • Sisense
    • Tableau
    • TIBCO Spotfire
  • Data Warehousing
    • DWH News and Info
    • IBM DB2
    • Microsoft SQL Server
    • Oracle
    • Teradata
  • Predictive Analytics
    • FICO
    • KNIME
    • Mathematica
    • Matlab
    • Minitab
    • RapidMiner
    • Revolution
    • SAP
    • SAS/SPSS
  • Humor

Sourcing: A Call For High-Stakes Evolution Across The Mill Products Industry

July 23, 2019   BI News and Info
 Sourcing: A Call For High Stakes Evolution Across The Mill Products Industry

Part 5 of the “State of the Mill Industry” series

Executives across mill products companies wake up every day in a world of volatility that impacts every aspect of the one thing that can make or break their business – sourcing. With the rising demand for highly tailored and configured products delivered in smaller lot sizes, within shorter lead times, and from ethical supply-chain practices, these asset-intensive operators are finding that becoming a low-cost producer is extraordinarily tricky.

Sourcing a block of assets and pigeonholing their use may have led to short-term savings and modest growth in the past. However, this traditional procurement strategy is beginning to squeeze supply chain planning and profit generation from an operational and control perspective.

In fact, according to the 2018 Deloitte CPO survey, 51% of procurement leaders are finding that their teams do not have sufficient capabilities and skills to execute a long-term strategy. Meanwhile, this talent gap continues to widen as two-thirds of surveyed participants delay the adoption of intelligent technologies such as predictive analytics and collaboration networks.

Opening decision-making mindsets to both sides of sourcing

Sourcing is a virtual web of growing complexity, increasing risk, and changing cost – and it’s only getting worse as the industry continues to experience a steady stream of acquisitions and mergers. Yet the function must be predictable enough to control overhead costs and flexible enough to tap the right suppliers to obtain the raw materials, components, machinery, parts, and maintenance services when they are needed.

To maintain this balance, mill products companies, just like most industries, break down their sourcing activities across a broad supplier base into two distinct categories: direct and indirect. However, this approach doesn’t necessarily provide the equilibrium of predictability and flexibility businesses need.

1. The reality of direct spend

In sourcing, direct spend is focused on the procurement of commodity-based materials. For example, a steel fabricator buys steel, and vertically integrated paper manufacturers purchase trees or land. The quality, quantity, and availability of the natural supplies are beyond their control – unless they have visibility into demand, can forecast future needs, and act on these insights with swiftness and agility.

Most companies acquire these capabilities by integrating themselves deeply into their suppliers’ manufacturing process. Responding to demand shifts and assessing significant asset requirements, the business and its suppliers can collaborate during the planning cycle to preserve their production capacity.

There’s a lot of back-and-forth communication that happens with, more often than not, a flurry of spreadsheets being exchanged. There’s nothing wrong with this practice, initially. But once demand, supply chain, economic conditions, and commodity costs shift, it’s challenging to pivot the entire chain of procurement and supply-chain stakeholders to address opportunities and risks before the business is impacted negatively. And when you are working with large volumes of data that continuously change, a lack of version control could quickly lead to outdated information. Common industry requirements such as hedging and risk exposure due to inventory replacements cost are often managed outside of an integrated system, if at all.

2. The reality of indirect spend

There are considerable opportunities in the mill products industry – which is the reason why so many mill operations are watching their assets to quickly address diminishing capacity or keep up with increasing demand. However, when procurement activities aren’t strategically managed over the long term and data management capabilities aren’t upgraded, an excess of capital can be deployed and that cost may be carried forward throughout the business.

Most mill products companies’ organizations seem to do an excellent job of managing this form of sourcing within their four walls. But when they start looking at it from a corporate perspective, their operations cannot systematically pull together numerous plants to optimize orders for items – such as spare parts for a machine they all use. These locations just do not have the right tools available to them – forcing each site’s maintenance person to order a part at a higher price compared to more cost-efficient bulk pricing.  Accurate master data and equipment digitization is critical to indirect spend optimization.

Balancing direct and indirect spend comes down to better data

This is the moment when procurement organizations should step up as a substantial enabler of asset availability – and a large part of their success boils down to data.

Exercising tremendous influence on the return of business assets, procurement leaders have the insights necessary to develop the workforce, optimize maintenance, reduce downtime perspective, and increase asset performance. Access to manufacturing data as well as information on equipment, spare parts, and bills of materials allows procurement organizations to assess external pressures and the boardroom’s desire to boost output, decrease cost, and increase efficiency.

But the function can go a step further by accelerating the capture, processing, and analysis of that intelligence in the moment mill equipment generates it. A machine may sense a performance level that is below the operation’s threshold, then trigger the supplier to send the malfunctioning part while a maintenance request is triggered and scheduled. When this capability is integrated into the maintenance, repair, and operations (MRO) process, indirect spend can become a predictive model of demand from consumers as well as shop-floor needs.

Digging into asset data to uncover the real treasure – hidden growth

While competitors continue to struggle to make sense of their large volume of disparate and varied data, mill products companies that can leverage their data to optimize asset performance and MRO spend will always stay a step ahead. They can optimize parts purchases and rationalize maintenance requests, all while pivoting operations to take on new opportunities and mitigate risks.

If you think about it, the math behind investing in initiatives to make better use of data is quite simple. The less downtime experienced, the more productive the shop floor – making return on assets go up and, ultimately, leading the way to a more profitable company.

For more insights, read the entire “State of the Mill Industry” series.

And please listen to the replay of our “Pathways to the Intelligent Enterprise” Webinar, featuring Phil Carter, chief analyst at IDC, and SAP’s Dan Kearnan and Ginger Gatling.

Let’s block ads! (Why?)

Digitalist Magazine

Across, Call, Evolution, HighStakes, Industry, Mill, products, Sourcing
  • Recent Posts

    • Now make soup!
    • Attach2Dynamics Or SharePoint Security Sync – Choose your smart app for effective document management in Dynamics 365 CRM/Power Apps.
    • 5 jobs that you should apply for this week (before it’s too late)
    • SQL Server authentication methods, logins, and database users
    • DAE solver fails for system of coupled partial differential equations
  • Categories

  • Archives

    • March 2021
    • February 2021
    • January 2021
    • December 2020
    • November 2020
    • October 2020
    • September 2020
    • August 2020
    • July 2020
    • June 2020
    • May 2020
    • April 2020
    • March 2020
    • February 2020
    • January 2020
    • December 2019
    • November 2019
    • October 2019
    • September 2019
    • August 2019
    • July 2019
    • June 2019
    • May 2019
    • April 2019
    • March 2019
    • February 2019
    • January 2019
    • December 2018
    • November 2018
    • October 2018
    • September 2018
    • August 2018
    • July 2018
    • June 2018
    • May 2018
    • April 2018
    • March 2018
    • February 2018
    • January 2018
    • December 2017
    • November 2017
    • October 2017
    • September 2017
    • August 2017
    • July 2017
    • June 2017
    • May 2017
    • April 2017
    • March 2017
    • February 2017
    • January 2017
    • December 2016
    • November 2016
    • October 2016
    • September 2016
    • August 2016
    • July 2016
    • June 2016
    • May 2016
    • April 2016
    • March 2016
    • February 2016
    • January 2016
    • December 2015
    • November 2015
    • October 2015
    • September 2015
    • August 2015
    • July 2015
    • June 2015
    • May 2015
    • April 2015
    • March 2015
    • February 2015
    • January 2015
    • December 2014
    • November 2014
© 2021 Business Intelligence Info
Power BI Training | G Com Solutions Limited