• Home
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Special Offers
Business Intelligence Info
  • Business Intelligence
    • BI News and Info
    • Big Data
    • Mobile and Cloud
    • Self-Service BI
  • CRM
    • CRM News and Info
    • InfusionSoft
    • Microsoft Dynamics CRM
    • NetSuite
    • OnContact
    • Salesforce
    • Workbooks
  • Data Mining
    • Pentaho
    • Sisense
    • Tableau
    • TIBCO Spotfire
  • Data Warehousing
    • DWH News and Info
    • IBM DB2
    • Microsoft SQL Server
    • Oracle
    • Teradata
  • Predictive Analytics
    • FICO
    • KNIME
    • Mathematica
    • Matlab
    • Minitab
    • RapidMiner
    • Revolution
    • SAP
    • SAS/SPSS
  • Humor

AI analyzes tweets to track conversations about city logistics

June 21, 2019   Big Data

Twitter’s veritable firehose of data has its uses, particularly in the fields of AI and machine learning. Chik-fil-A recently began tapping it to spot signs of foodborne illness at its restaurants, and scientists at the Joint Research Center — the European Commission’s science and knowledge service — earlier this year detailed a prototype that gauges real-time flood reports from Twitter users. Now, in a new city logistics study (“Unsupervised Machine Learning to Analyse City Logistics“) spearheaded by a Mines ParisTech team, tweets were analyzed by a machine learning algorithm to track conversation trends concerning city logistics, particularly around issues like low emission zones and urban distribution centers.

“The role of logistics is to make goods (and services) available to consumers efficiently, both in terms of costs and customer service … City logistics policymaking is complex as it requires diagnosis and analysis, thus observation,” wrote the coauthors, who noted that practical barriers often stymie large-scale city logistics surveys. “This paper …  examines how [it can] contribute to … observation and analysis.”

In the course of their work, the team leveraged two key machine learning techniques known as dimensionality reduction and clustering. The former reduces the number of variables under consideration by obtaining a set of principal variables, while clustering groups objects in such a way that objects in the same group have more in common compared with objects in other groups.

 AI analyzes tweets to track conversations about city logistics

The researchers’ machine learning model then scraped Twitter for phrases like “city logistics,” “last-mile logistics,” “urban logistics,” and “urban freight,” and collected tweets filtered to erase both undesired content (such as links, symbols, and linking words) and duplicate entries. Words in the text were then lemmatized — or grouped together such that they could be analyzed as a single item — and combined into a map of features.

The team next performed sentiment analysis on the extracted text with the open source Natural Language Toolkit (NLTK), a suite of libraries and programs for English-language symbolic and statistical natural language processing. They calculated the polarity score (negative versus positive) of each sample using Valence Aware Dictionary and Sentiment Reasoner (VADER), a rule-based sentiment intensity analyzer, and computed traditional statistics.

On a data set of 111,265 tweets published between 2007 and 2018 containing key city logistics terms, they found that the phrase “city logistics” tended to be more popular (appearing in 66% of tweets) than “urban logistics” (9% of tweets) and “urban freight” (6%), and that the most commonly occurring city logistics phrases were related to employment (“commercial driver’s license,” “job,” “CDL”). Among other insights, the team reports that Kansas City — a key transit point for commerce in the U.S. — was in the top-five most active regions by volume of activity related to city logistics, according to the results, and that the proportion of positive logistics-related content increased from 43% in 2016 to 68% in 2018.

“In order to assess what social media mining can bring to the observation of city logistics, it is critical to identify under-represented issues and/or blind spot,” wrote the researchers. ” Quite satisfyingly, one can find a rather large range of issues (e.g. road safety, fuel consumption, sustainability, urban fabric, etc.) and solutions (e.g. training, ICT, urban consolidation centers, clean vehicles, cargo-bikes, etc.) … In contrast, some concepts, very much advertised in academic circles, are almost absent in the corpus (e.g. 21 tweets about the Physical Internet, eight about off-hour deliveries, three about synchro-modality).”

The team notes that their approach doesn’t consider account activity level, reach, or biases, which they leave to future work. Still, they consider Twitter a “formidable opportunity” for city logistics stakeholders because of the platform’s sheer size.

Let’s block ads! (Why?)

Big Data – VentureBeat

About, analyzes, City, Logistics, track, tweets, ‘Conversations
  • Recent Posts

    • Accelerate Your Data Strategies and Investments to Stay Competitive in the Banking Sector
    • SQL Server Security – Fixed server and database roles
    • Teradata Named a Leader in Cloud Data Warehouse Evaluation by Independent Research Firm
    • Derivative of a norm
    • TODAY’S OPEN THREAD
  • Categories

  • Archives

    • April 2021
    • March 2021
    • February 2021
    • January 2021
    • December 2020
    • November 2020
    • October 2020
    • September 2020
    • August 2020
    • July 2020
    • June 2020
    • May 2020
    • April 2020
    • March 2020
    • February 2020
    • January 2020
    • December 2019
    • November 2019
    • October 2019
    • September 2019
    • August 2019
    • July 2019
    • June 2019
    • May 2019
    • April 2019
    • March 2019
    • February 2019
    • January 2019
    • December 2018
    • November 2018
    • October 2018
    • September 2018
    • August 2018
    • July 2018
    • June 2018
    • May 2018
    • April 2018
    • March 2018
    • February 2018
    • January 2018
    • December 2017
    • November 2017
    • October 2017
    • September 2017
    • August 2017
    • July 2017
    • June 2017
    • May 2017
    • April 2017
    • March 2017
    • February 2017
    • January 2017
    • December 2016
    • November 2016
    • October 2016
    • September 2016
    • August 2016
    • July 2016
    • June 2016
    • May 2016
    • April 2016
    • March 2016
    • February 2016
    • January 2016
    • December 2015
    • November 2015
    • October 2015
    • September 2015
    • August 2015
    • July 2015
    • June 2015
    • May 2015
    • April 2015
    • March 2015
    • February 2015
    • January 2015
    • December 2014
    • November 2014
© 2021 Business Intelligence Info
Power BI Training | G Com Solutions Limited