• Home
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Special Offers
Business Intelligence Info
  • Business Intelligence
    • BI News and Info
    • Big Data
    • Mobile and Cloud
    • Self-Service BI
  • CRM
    • CRM News and Info
    • InfusionSoft
    • Microsoft Dynamics CRM
    • NetSuite
    • OnContact
    • Salesforce
    • Workbooks
  • Data Mining
    • Pentaho
    • Sisense
    • Tableau
    • TIBCO Spotfire
  • Data Warehousing
    • DWH News and Info
    • IBM DB2
    • Microsoft SQL Server
    • Oracle
    • Teradata
  • Predictive Analytics
    • FICO
    • KNIME
    • Mathematica
    • Matlab
    • Minitab
    • RapidMiner
    • Revolution
    • SAP
    • SAS/SPSS
  • Humor

FCC Slaps Comcast With $2.3M Overbilling Fine

October 18, 2016   CRM News and Info

The U.S. Federal Communications Commission on Tuesday announced that Comcast would pay a record US$ 2.3 million fine to settle its investigation into whether the cable operator improperly charged customers for services and equipment they never approved, a practice known as “zero billing option.”

Federal law bans cable operators from charging customers for unauthorized equipment or services.

“It is basic that a cable bill should include charges only for services and equipment ordered by the customer — nothing more and nothing less,” said Travis LeBlanc, chief of the FCC’s enforcement bureau. “We expect all cable and phone companies to take responsibility for the accuracy of their bills and ensure their customers have authorized any charges.”

Oversell Activities

The FCC received numerous complaints that Comcast charged customers for unauthorized equipment, including set-top boxes, digital video recorders. Some received premium channels they had not ordered. In many cases, customers specifically declined certain items and were charged for them anyway.

Customers complained that they sometimes received unordered equipment in the mail, got bills with charges they found only after close review, or were notified by email of changes they did not request.

Some customers also reported spending hours on the phone with Comcast trying to resolve the issues.

Under the terms of the consent decree, Comcast must abide by a five-year compliance plan. The agreement calls for Comcast to notify customers of new equipment or upgrades separately from regular bills. It allows customers to block new services automatically and requires the company to implement new dispute resolution procedures.

Comcast has been “laser-focused” on improving its customer service, the company said. It acknowledged that past shortcomings in its customer service and lack of clarity in its billing resulted in unnecessary customer frustration and confusion.

Comcast had initiated improvements even before the FCC’s Enforcement Bureau began its investigation two years ago, it claimed. It disagreed with the bureau’s legal theory and added that the probe found isolated errors and complaints rather than intentional wrongdoing.

Congressional Hearings

The overbilling problem was the subject of hearings on Capitol Hill led by Sen. Rob Portman, R-Ohio, and Sen. Claire McCaskill, D-Mo., respectively the chair and ranking member of the Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations.

Overbilling has been a widespread problem throughout the cable and satellite industry, the subcommittee reported. Senate hearings in June and related investigations found that Charter overbilled its customers by $ 5.3 million annually, and Time Warner Cable overbilled by $ 12.5 million over a six-year period. The companies agreed to give credits to thousands of customers as a result of the findings.

Legislators last month urged the FCC to examine practices of the cable industry, based on committee testimony and reports.

The Comcast investigation could have a short-term impact on the company’s relationships with its customers, suggested telecom analyst Jeff Kagan, considering the increased number of cord-cutting options available to the public.

“Yesterday, cable television companies simply didn’t care about what customers thought of them since there was no other choice. However, during the last decade we have seen competition grow and take away share from Comcast and all cable television companies,” he told CRM Buyer.

That said, “it would be naive to think that Comcast or any other incumbent will clean up their act because of the FCC’s actions,” said broadband analyst Craig Settles.

“Even though this is a ‘record breaking’ fine,” he told CRM Buyer, “in the corporate world this is a cost of doing business that is easier to pay than the cost of cleaning up the problem.” end enn FCC Slaps Comcast With $2.3M Overbilling Fine


David Jones is a freelance writer based in Essex County, New Jersey. He has written for Reuters, Bloomberg, Crain’s New York Business and The New York Times.

Let’s block ads! (Why?)

CRM Buyer

$2.3M, Comcast, fine, Overbilling, Slaps
  • Recent Posts

    • The Neanderthals
    • What the swarm of new Azure announcements mean
    • Importance of Integrating SharePoint and Dynamics 365 in an SMB
    • InfoWars Surrenders
    • Invest Your Time in the Right Skills to Become a Data Scientist in 2021
  • Categories

  • Archives

    • March 2021
    • February 2021
    • January 2021
    • December 2020
    • November 2020
    • October 2020
    • September 2020
    • August 2020
    • July 2020
    • June 2020
    • May 2020
    • April 2020
    • March 2020
    • February 2020
    • January 2020
    • December 2019
    • November 2019
    • October 2019
    • September 2019
    • August 2019
    • July 2019
    • June 2019
    • May 2019
    • April 2019
    • March 2019
    • February 2019
    • January 2019
    • December 2018
    • November 2018
    • October 2018
    • September 2018
    • August 2018
    • July 2018
    • June 2018
    • May 2018
    • April 2018
    • March 2018
    • February 2018
    • January 2018
    • December 2017
    • November 2017
    • October 2017
    • September 2017
    • August 2017
    • July 2017
    • June 2017
    • May 2017
    • April 2017
    • March 2017
    • February 2017
    • January 2017
    • December 2016
    • November 2016
    • October 2016
    • September 2016
    • August 2016
    • July 2016
    • June 2016
    • May 2016
    • April 2016
    • March 2016
    • February 2016
    • January 2016
    • December 2015
    • November 2015
    • October 2015
    • September 2015
    • August 2015
    • July 2015
    • June 2015
    • May 2015
    • April 2015
    • March 2015
    • February 2015
    • January 2015
    • December 2014
    • November 2014
© 2021 Business Intelligence Info
Power BI Training | G Com Solutions Limited