• Home
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Special Offers
Business Intelligence Info
  • Business Intelligence
    • BI News and Info
    • Big Data
    • Mobile and Cloud
    • Self-Service BI
  • CRM
    • CRM News and Info
    • InfusionSoft
    • Microsoft Dynamics CRM
    • NetSuite
    • OnContact
    • Salesforce
    • Workbooks
  • Data Mining
    • Pentaho
    • Sisense
    • Tableau
    • TIBCO Spotfire
  • Data Warehousing
    • DWH News and Info
    • IBM DB2
    • Microsoft SQL Server
    • Oracle
    • Teradata
  • Predictive Analytics
    • FICO
    • KNIME
    • Mathematica
    • Matlab
    • Minitab
    • RapidMiner
    • Revolution
    • SAP
    • SAS/SPSS
  • Humor

Supreme Court Ecommerce Tax Decision Opens Pandora’s Box for Retailers

June 23, 2018   NetSuite

Posted by Ian McCue, Content Manager

The federal government took a major step toward regulating ecommerce on Thursday when the Supreme Court upheld a South Dakota law that allows the state to gather sales tax from online businesses with at least $ 100,000 in sales from state residents or 200 transactions in the state annually. This overturned a ruling from 1992, Quill Corp. v. North Dakota, that prevented states from collecting taxes from companies without a physical presence in their state.

The 5-4 decision is meant to level the playing field between online sellers and traditional brick-and-mortar retailers. In the coming months and years, states will change their laws on ecommerce taxes based on this decision. Ecommerce sales added up to $ 450 billion in 2017, 13 percent of all retail sales.

Forty-five states have some kind of sales tax and online sales represent billions of dollars-worth of taxes every year, per NPR. Some states already have workaround laws in place to collect sales tax online, but experts predict they will scrap those in favor of legislation modeled after South Dakota.

Additionally, certain large online retailers already collect sales tax. Amazon charges taxes on all direct sales but not those from third-party businesses who sell through its site. Wayfair, one of three companies who challenged the initial South Dakota law, collects tax on about 80 percent of orders, according to The Hill.

However, this opens Pandora’s box for many smaller ecommerce companies that sell nationally but do not impose taxes. This provided certain online retailers with a competitive advantage – not only might it attract more customers to shop on the site, but the company did not need to worry about calculating or paying taxes on out-of-state orders.

Chief Justice John Roberts was not in favor of the ruling and expressed concern that the decision will slow the growth of ecommerce.

“Ecommerce has grown into a significant and vibrant part of our national economy against the backdrop of established rules, including the physical-presence rule,” Roberts wrote in the dissenting opinion. “Any alteration to those rules with the potential to disrupt the development of such a critical segment of the economy should be undertaken by Congress.”

Even before this decision, small businesses face a complex web of tax laws.

“Texas taxes sales of plain deodorant at 6.25 percent but imposes no tax on deodorant with antiperspirant,” Roberts wrote. “Illinois categorizes Twix and Snickers bars — chocolate-and-caramel confections usually displayed side-by-side in the candy aisle — as food and candy, respectively (Twix have flour; Snickers don’t), and taxes them differently.”

The President of the National Retail Federation, Matthew Shay, called for lawmakers to draw up universal rules that can be applied to all states and will minimize complications. While this would be ideal for retailers, it may not be realistic.

“Congress must now follow the Court’s lead and pass legislation implementing uniform national rules that provide consistency and clarity for retailers across the country,” Shay told The Hill.

This ruling will make robust commerce technology and tax compliance software a necessity for even small online sellers. They need a scalable way to automate taxes that may vary based on where a customer resides and a way to repay that money to the state. Technology providers will need to move quickly as ecommerce tax laws spring up.

Companies using a cloud system for financials and ecommerce are well-positioned for this change because as the vendor modifies the platform to address these challenges, updates are automatically pushed out to all customers.

A business platform that unifies commerce and financials is especially advantageous because it can calculate, capture and report on taxes across channels. The system automates tax-related tasks on all sales, whether an in-store purchase or online orders from customers spread across states, so staff doesn’t waste time dealing with such headaches.

Time will tell how this Supreme Court ruling impacts online retailers and how quickly, but change is brewing. What is clear is businesses with a unified platform that can painlessly manage sales tax will be better prepared for the change and continue to power the remarkable rise of ecommerce.

To learn more about the latest trends and news in ecommerce, check out this recap from the 2018 Internet Retail Conference and Exhibition.

Posted on Fri, June 22, 2018
by NetSuite filed under

Let’s block ads! (Why?)

The NetSuite Blog

court, Decision, Ecommerce, opens, Pandora’s, Retailers, Supreme
  • Recent Posts

    • THEY CAN FIND THE GUY WHO BROKE A WINDOW BUT NOT A MURDERER?
    • TIBCO4Good and She Loves Data Offer Free Data Skills Workshops During a Time of Vulnerability
    • Aurora partners with Paccar to develop driverless trucks
    • “Without Data, Nothing” — Building Apps That Last With Data
    • SO MUCH FOR GLOBAL WARMING, EH?
  • Categories

  • Archives

    • January 2021
    • December 2020
    • November 2020
    • October 2020
    • September 2020
    • August 2020
    • July 2020
    • June 2020
    • May 2020
    • April 2020
    • March 2020
    • February 2020
    • January 2020
    • December 2019
    • November 2019
    • October 2019
    • September 2019
    • August 2019
    • July 2019
    • June 2019
    • May 2019
    • April 2019
    • March 2019
    • February 2019
    • January 2019
    • December 2018
    • November 2018
    • October 2018
    • September 2018
    • August 2018
    • July 2018
    • June 2018
    • May 2018
    • April 2018
    • March 2018
    • February 2018
    • January 2018
    • December 2017
    • November 2017
    • October 2017
    • September 2017
    • August 2017
    • July 2017
    • June 2017
    • May 2017
    • April 2017
    • March 2017
    • February 2017
    • January 2017
    • December 2016
    • November 2016
    • October 2016
    • September 2016
    • August 2016
    • July 2016
    • June 2016
    • May 2016
    • April 2016
    • March 2016
    • February 2016
    • January 2016
    • December 2015
    • November 2015
    • October 2015
    • September 2015
    • August 2015
    • July 2015
    • June 2015
    • May 2015
    • April 2015
    • March 2015
    • February 2015
    • January 2015
    • December 2014
    • November 2014
© 2021 Business Intelligence Info
Power BI Training | G Com Solutions Limited