• Home
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Special Offers
Business Intelligence Info
  • Business Intelligence
    • BI News and Info
    • Big Data
    • Mobile and Cloud
    • Self-Service BI
  • CRM
    • CRM News and Info
    • InfusionSoft
    • Microsoft Dynamics CRM
    • NetSuite
    • OnContact
    • Salesforce
    • Workbooks
  • Data Mining
    • Pentaho
    • Sisense
    • Tableau
    • TIBCO Spotfire
  • Data Warehousing
    • DWH News and Info
    • IBM DB2
    • Microsoft SQL Server
    • Oracle
    • Teradata
  • Predictive Analytics
    • FICO
    • KNIME
    • Mathematica
    • Matlab
    • Minitab
    • RapidMiner
    • Revolution
    • SAP
    • SAS/SPSS
  • Humor

Tag Archives: Health

COVID-19 vaccine distribution algorithms may cement health care inequalities

December 21, 2020   Big Data

Earlier this month, following the U.S. Federal Food and Drug Administration’s emergency approval, the federal government began distributing doses of Pfizer’s COVID-19 vaccine to health systems throughout the country. With Moderna’s vaccine to follow, the Trump administration aims to deliver the first shots to 20 million people by year’s end.

But shipments must be prioritized in a country of over 300 million people. This logistical challenge has fallen on algorithms designed to account for a range of factors in identifying which populations are most vulnerable. Problematically, however, a lack of transparency plagues their decision-making processes. And given the body of research showing algorithms can encode biases against certain demographic groups, particularly minorities and low-income earners, experts believe this is cause for concern.

Tiberius

In an effort to achieve its goal of inoculating 100 million Americans by Q1 2021, the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services partnered with data-mining firm Palantir to develop a software platform called Tiberius. Tiberius, which covers 50 states, eight territories, the Veterans Health Administration, the Bureau of Prisons, the Indian Health Service, and the departments of Defense and State, allows states and federal agencies to see health care providers enrolled in VTrckS, the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s (CDC) vaccine tracking system. They can also use Tiberius to make decisions about where they send the vaccine within their jurisdictions.

Each Thursday, vaccine producers inform Operation Warp Speed, the U.S. public-private COVID-19 treatment development partnership, how much vaccine is available for the upcoming week. On Friday, Tiberius runs an algorithm that draws on variables including adult population and vaccine uptake and allocates the number of doses available to every state. On Saturday, every state finalizes their orders, and deliveries arrive on Monday.

Operation Warp Speed’s chief of plans Col. Deacon Maddox has described Tiberius’ algorithm as “simple,” “equitable,” and “fair.” According to Maddox, it takes as input “risk-adjusted” manufacturing estimates, a small portion from which is subtracted to provide a “safety stock” and the remainder of which is divided by population estimates from the U.S. Census Bureau’s 2018 American Community Survey and the CIA’s World Factbook.

While it’s impossible to know exactly which variables the Tiberius algorithm considers in its decisions — that information isn’t public — its reliance on U.S. census data is cause for worry. Because of time constraints, a shortage of manpower, and other confounders, the Census Bureau regularly undercounts populations in certain regions of the country. For example, studies have shown the undercount for Black men, particularly those aged 30 to 49, is much higher than the net undercount rate for the total Black population or total male population.

The impact could be devastating. Black Americans are infected with COVID-19 at nearly three times the rate of white Americans and are more than twice as likely to die from the virus, according to data from Johns Hopkins University. That’s partly because Black people are more likely to have preexisting conditions that predispose them to infection, less likely to have health insurance, and more likely to work in jobs that don’t accommodate remote work.

“There’s this question of underreporting and overreporting. [It] doesn’t just impact assessments of how many doses are needed in a particular area, but also the priority of those doses,” Os Keyes, an AI researcher at the University of Washington’s Department of Human Centered Design and Engineering, told VentureBeat via email. “If you are not including vulnerable populations as often, you are undercounting population — which means you have a false sense of geographic density. Moreover, your sense of geographic density is missing people who, as a result of their treatment and lives, are more likely to live in dense housing, low-quality housing, places where social distancing is particularly difficult and preexisting health inequalities that exacerbate vulnerability to COVID are particularly high.”

State algorithms

Beyond Tiberius, some states including Ohio, Wisconsin, South Carolina, New Hampshire, Delaware, Tennessee, and Arizona are using algorithms developed in-house to determine how vaccines should be distributed locally.

According to a draft document outlining Ohio’s distribution plan, the state’s algorithm, which was created by the Ohio Department of Health (ODH), takes into account the number of target population groups in a county, the current case count, the level of natural immunity that might exist, labels like “social vulnerability” and “health equity,” and the amount and type of storage providers have on hand. The population estimates come from census information in addition to U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, nursing home, and medical claims data, while factors like social vulnerability and health equity are determined using the CDC’s Social Vulnerability Index, which uses 15 U.S. census metrics to identify disadvantaged communities that might need additional support during disasters.

The document also reveals that ODH considered geographies and populations with vulnerabilities or structural disadvantages, including low access to health care or those disproportionately affected by COVID-19, as well as locations where social distancing may be most challenging due to population density. The department also looked at where historical flu vaccination rates were lower compared with other regions. And to identify high-risk health care workers, the ODH mailed a survey to local health department grant recipients in 113 jurisdictions requiring that they identify their critical workforce.

Above: New Hampshire’s proposed vaccine distribution algorithm.

The machinations of South Carolina’s algorithm are less immediately clear. According to a state-issued document, it accounts for the number of recipients a site can vaccinate, a site’s vaccine storage and handling capacity, a site’s geographic location, and allocations of vaccine received and timing. But it’s unclear whether the algorithm factors in population data and from where this population data might be sourced. Moreover, South Carolina’s document makes only passing mention of efforts to ensure disadvantaged groups are fairly represented.

In its draft distribution plan, Tennessee says it’s distributing the Pfizer vaccine across “qualifying facilities” by hand but plans to use an algorithm to allocate the Moderna vaccine. The document doesn’t describe this algorithm in detail, though, or identify which department will be responsible for implementing it and the sources of data that might influence its predictions. Arizona and Wisconsin have been similarly vague about where, when, and how their algorithms might be used; Arizona Department of Health Services officials have revealed only that their algorithm, which was provided by the CDC, prioritizes health care workers with the most exposure to people with COVID-19 as well as those with underlying conditions.

Perpetuating inequality

It’s not just states that are using — or pledging to use — algorithms to determine who receives the vaccine first (and who doesn’t). At George Washington University Hospital (GWUH), groups are selected by a system that takes into account age, underlying medical conditions, prevention of transmission, and the hospital’s ability to continue its own operations. At press time, the GWUH hadn’t responded to VentureBeat’s request for more information.

Keyes raises the concern that it’s nebulous, in many cases, how organizations and agencies using algorithms plan to supplement missing data. He notes that the CDC’s Social Vulnerability Index only began canvassing Puerto Rico in 2014 — the only U.S. territory it covers — and that the American Community Survey includes only a handful of territories and tribal nations.

Problems have already begun to emerge. Yesterday, ProPublica reported that Stanford Medicine residents who work in close contact with COVID-19 patients were left out of the initial wave for the Pfizer vaccine. An algorithm chose who would be the first 5,000 in line; the residents were told they were at a disadvantage because they lacked an assigned “location” to plug into the calculation and because they’re young.

“We are writing to acknowledge the significant concerns expressed by our community regarding the development and execution of our vaccine distribution plan,” leaders of Stanford Health Care and Stanford School of Medicine wrote in an email to staff apologizing for the debacle, NPR reported on Friday evening. “We take complete responsibility and profusely apologize to all of you. We fully recognize we should have acted more swiftly to address the errors that resulted in an outcome we did not anticipate,” they wrote.

“When I hear you’re covering 50 states and eight territories with data determined, in part, from these sources, I want to know what on earth you’re doing when some of those sources just aren’t available,” Keyes said. “Working it out on the back of an envelope? Giving up entirely? The answer might be a good one, and the approach might be the best one they can take at the time, but it’s worrisome that the answer isn’t, as far as I can tell, known.”

As vaccine distribution ramps up into next year, it’s likely that federal and state agencies and health care systems will respond to distribution kinks by refining their algorithms. Still, there’s cause for worry in these early stages. Officials in more than a dozen states have complained they’re receiving fewer doses than promised, and Pfizer claims the federal government hasn’t issued shipping instructions for millions of doses currently sitting in warehouses. If left unaddressed for too long, the lack of transparency, combined with unbalanced sources of data and methodologies, threaten to cement health care inequalities in communities throughout the U.S.

Let’s block ads! (Why?)

Big Data – VentureBeat

Read More

Quil launches in-home health monitoring solution as telemedicine usage explodes

October 12, 2020   Big Data

Automation and Jobs

Read our latest special issue.

Open Now

Quil Health, the health care joint venture of Comcast and Independence Health Group, today announced plans to launch Quil Assure, a platform that leverages sensors, voice-activated tech, and coordination tools to connect caregivers with loved ones. Quil says over time Assure will integrate with its existing product, Engage, to help customers manage their health and wellness needs.

In response to the novel coronavirus pandemic, companies like Current Health and Twistle have teamed up with the Providence and other health care providers to pilot at-home health-tracking platforms. Even before the pandemic, nine in 10 seniors said they’d prefer to stay in their homes over the next 10 years, highlighting the need for remote health monitoring solutions.

ABI Research predicts that by 2025 spending on AI in health care and pharmaceuticals will have increased by $ 1.5 billion as a result of COVID-19. Meanwhile, the personal emergency response systems market is anticipated to pass $ 11.1 billion within that same time frame.

Quil says Assure will “get to know” customers over time using activity-monitoring sensors (e.g., motion, temperature, and air quality sensors) that send real-time alerts and notifications. Assure’s voice capabilities will enable caregivers to reach out through in-home speakers and check in on loved ones, and the platform will allow clinicians to work together to support patients and better manage transitional care.

Quil plans to launch Assure by Q3 2021, following a series of pilots this December.

 Quil launches in home health monitoring solution as telemedicine usage explodes

“Consumer health platforms fall short of delivering on the promise of engagement, wearable monitoring technologies are limiting, and caregivers are often left in the dark,” Quil CEO Carina Edwards said in a statement. “Quil is rethinking the whole aging at home experience with an integrated platform that fits into our daily lives. Personalized education and step-by-step guidance to engage consumers and caregivers combined with in-home smart sensors to monitor health in real time are just the beginning.”

Launched in 2018 as a partnership between Independence Blue Cross and Comcast, Quil provides health itineraries via an app that can be prescribed by doctors or offered through insurance carriers. The company also provides educational content, including documents, surveys, and videos covering pre- and post-op care and at-home physical therapies.

Comcast subscribers can say the phrase “Quil Health” into their television remotes to access Quil’s on-demand content. In addition, the cable giant offers a home security system that includes sensors and AI capable of detecting customers’ movements for health monitoring.

Quil Health recently launched the COVID-19 Preparedness Tool, which provides up-to-the-minute information on the novel coronavirus, including a symptoms checklist, recommendations from the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, and tips on how to care for a family member with COVID-19. The tool focuses on overall wellness, providing instructions on self-care, stress reduction, and in-home exercise techniques, as well as finding a work/life balance while working from home, best practices for child care, and guides to homeschooling.

Let’s block ads! (Why?)

Big Data – VentureBeat

Read More

Verint Automates Management of Return-to-Work Health Practices

June 10, 2020   CRM News and Info

Verint on Tuesday announced new capabilities within its workforce management solution that automate compliance with CDC guidelines to reduce the risk of COVID-19 infection as employees transition back to the workplace.

New workflows automatically create a comprehensive schedule that is prescriptive, while including traditional workforce management criteria such as skill level, channels and peak hours.

Among the recommended modifications:

  • Implementing staggered start times;
  • Managing a mix of work-from-home and in-office agents;
  • Adhering to safe distancing scheduling recommendations for buildings’ capacities, by floor, workspaces or zones;
  • Instituting employee health checks, and allocating extra time for hygiene;
  • Providing equal opportunities for employees to rotate in and out of the office;
  • Ensuring employees who are not ready to return to the office are not scheduled to do so; and
  • Accommodating mobile scheduling requests and notifications about schedule changes.

“Effectively managing today’s workforce is crucial for improving customer experience, operational efficiency and compliance,” said Kelly Koelliker, Verint’s director of solutions marketing.

“Yet currently rising expectations of both customers and employees have made forecasting and scheduling contact center agents and customer engagement resources exponentially more challenging.” she told CRM Buyer.

Verint’s solution “leverages artificial intelligence-infused automation and mobile tools to streamline forecasting and scheduling,” Koelliker remarked, and its flexible workflows let customers “transition back as slowly or as quickly as regulations and business needs warrant.”

Getting Ahead of the Game

“The inclusion of new capabilities makes [Verint] more competitive,” observed Evelyn McMullen, research analyst at Nucleus Research.

“Some large human capital management and workforce management vendors have rolled out contact-tracing functionality, but not much else has been done to address reopening operations beyond Q&As instructing users on how to use their existing capabilities to navigate new regulations,” she told CRM Buyer.

Verint’s solution is tailored for call centers, McMullen said, so, although it’s “ahead of the market in its response to reopening measures, this could be overlooked due to the fact that it is not a primary workforce management provider and is not optimized for most industries.”

The retail industry “will absolutely need these types of automated workflows in their workforce management applications, especially as schedule planning is expected to be one of the greatest challenges upon reopening,” she pointed out.

Obeying the Rules

Ninety-three percent of more than 300 human resources executives responding to an online Challenger, Gray & Christmas survey this spring said
they would take precautions once their staff returned to work.

The respondents were from companies of various sizes with a national presence in the United State and representing a range of industries.

Rules for Work Post-Lockdown

The U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s
guidelines include recommendations for the following:

  • Social distancing within the office;
  • Daily health checks;
  • Various workplace hygiene protocols, including conducting a hazard assessment of the workplace;
  • Improving building ventilation systems; and
  • Coordinating with state and local health officials to ensure compliance with local requirements.

Employers also must check the CDC website regularly for guidance updates.

The U.S. Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) also prepared
guidance for reopening workplaces.

The U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOCO) has issued
00000guidelines on a variety of pandemic-related workplace issues.

State and local governments hav issued their own guidelines. Here are the
guidelines for Massachusetts, for example.

“Regulations are in flux worldwide,” observed Rob Enderle, principal analyst at the Enderle Group.

“From a global perspective, they should be — and likely have been — changing far more rapidly than they usually would, to address the expanding pandemic problem,” he told CRM Buyer.

Forty-seven percent of the respondents to the Challenger, Gray survey said they would follow the lead of their state governments with regard to reopening for business.

Another nearly 14 percent said they would heed the advice of a combination of local, state and federal leaders, as well as leading scientific experts and internal research. Of the remainder, 13 percent said they would adhere to the federal government’s guidelines, and nearly 13 percent said they would follow the advice of leading scientific experts.

Good Things Come in Small Companies

Although Verint does not crack the top 10 list of workforce management vendors, “the true advantage of a smaller player like Verint is that because they’re small, they tend to spend more time understanding and engaging with their accounts,” Enderle pointed out.

“Their power is the ability to better listen to and respond to unique customer requirements and aspirational needs,” he said. “They may never be the most feature-rich, but they should be more responsive than their larger competitors.”

The pros of Verint’s approach “include a significant amount of capability to deal with the new normal — the highly customizable nature of the offering, and how it anticipates the coming needs,” Enderle noted.

“The cons are that Verint is a relatively small company and may become spread too thinly as firms come back to market and collectively need a lot of help to adjust. They could exceed Verint’s consulting resources,” he said.

The new capabilities are for current Verint customers, whether they are using its solution on-premises or in the cloud, said Koelliker.

The new workflow “is a low-cost services package,” she noted, and a “small services engagement” will instruct customers on how to configure the solution so they can manage it for themselves.
end enn Verint Automates Management of Return to Work Health Practices


Richard%20Adhikari Verint Automates Management of Return to Work Health Practices
Richard Adhikari has been an ECT News Network reporter since 2008. His areas of focus include cybersecurity, mobile technologies, CRM, databases, software development, mainframe and mid-range computing, and application development. He has written and edited for numerous publications, including Information Week and Computerworld. He is the author of two books on client/server technology.
Email Richard.

Let’s block ads! (Why?)

CRM Buyer

Read More

Health care organizations use Nvidia’s Clara federated learning to improve mammogram analysis AI

April 16, 2020   Big Data

A group of health care organizations in the United States and Brazil have used federated learning to improve AI mammography classification models for recognizing tumors and breast tissue density assessment. An Nvidia spokesperson declined to share specific performance details, but said a combined effort led to better classification model performance than models made by any of the individual health care organizations. Impacting 2.1 million people a year, according to the World Health Organization, breast cancer is the most frequently occurring cancer in women around the world.

Federated learning is a way to create AI models from data in multiple locations without a need to store all the data in the same place. Models are trained at their source and learnings are shared with a single generalized model without the transfer of data. Apple and Google use federated learning for keyboard personalization today, but in health care, federated learning can combine anonymized data to improve machine intelligence geared toward saving human lives.

“Federated learning presents an opportunity for health care organizations worldwide to work together without compromising on the data security of patient records,” AI and health researcher Jayashree Kalpathy-Cramer said in an Nvidia blog post today sharing the news. “With this methodology, we can collectively raise the bar for AI tools in medicine.”

The work is the result of a collaboration that took place between January and March and pools resources from the American College of Radiology, Brazilian imaging center Diagnosticos da America, Partners HealthCare, The Ohio State University, and Stanford Medicine. The federated learning model was trained using more than 130,000 images from 33,000 mammography studies, Nvidia VP of health care Kimberly Powell told VentureBeat. Hospitals worked together using the Clara Federated Learning SDK.

This is the second such combined demonstration of federated learning by health care researchers using Nvidia’s Clara Medical Imaging platform. Last fall, Nvidia and Kings College London worked together on a federated learning neural network for brain tumor segmentation.

 Health care organizations use Nvidia’s Clara federated learning to improve mammogram analysis AI

In other Clara news, Powell said Nvidia is working with collaborators to release coronavirus-related models trained with federated learning through the Clara Imaging Software in the future. Last week, Nvidia launched Clara Deploy 5.4 for multi-domain pipelines on a unified GPU infrastructure.

Let’s block ads! (Why?)

Big Data – VentureBeat

Read More

Babylon Health claims its AI accurately triages patients in 85% of cases

March 31, 2020   Big Data

A team of researchers at Babylon Health, the well-funded UK-based startup that facilitates telemedical consultations between patients and health experts, claim that they’ve developed an AI system capable of matching expert clinician decisions in 85% of cases. If it holds up to scrutiny, the system could lift a burden off of the overloaded U.S. health care system, which is anticipated to face a shortfall of between 21,000 and 55,000 primary care doctors by 2023.

Triaging in this context refers to the process of uncovering enough medical evidence to determine the appropriate point of care given a patient’s presentation. Clinicians plan a sequence of questions in order to make a fast and accurate decision, inferring about the causes of a condition and updating their plan following each new piece of information.

The Babylon Health team sought an automated approach built upon reinforcement learning, an AI training paradigm that spurs software agents to complete tasks via a system of rewards. They combined this with judgments from medical experts made over a data set of patient presentations, which encapsulated roughly 597 elements of observable symptoms or risk factors.

The researchers’ AI agent — a Deep Q network — learned an optimized policy based on 1,374 expert-crafted clinical vignettes. Each vignette was associated with an average of 3.36 expert triage decisions made by separate clinicians, and the validity of each vignette was reviewed independently with two clinicians.

At each step, the agent asks for more information or makes one of four triage decisions. And at each new episode, the training environment is configured with a new clinical vignette. Then the said environment processes evidence and triage decisions on the vignette and returns a value, such that if the agent picks a triage action, it receives a final reward.

 Babylon Health claims its AI accurately triages patients in 85% of cases

To validate the system, the researchers evaluated the model on a test set of 126 previously unseen vignettes using three target metrics: appropriateness, safety, and the average number of questions asked (between 0 and 23). During training on 1,248 vignettes, those metrics were evaluated over a sliding window of 20 vignettes, and during testing, they were evaluated over the whole test set.

The team reports that the best-performing model achieved an appropriateness score of .85 and a safety score of 0.93, and it asked an average of 13.34 (0.875). That’s on par with the human baseline (0.84 appropriateness, 0.93 safety, and all 23 questions).

“By learning when best to stop asking questions given a patient presentation, the [system] is able to produce an optimized policy which reaches the same performance as supervised methods while requiring less evidence. It improves upon clinician policies by combining information from several experts for each of the clinical presentations.” wrote the paper’s coauthors, who point out that the agent isn’t trained to ask specific questions and can be used in conjunction with any question-answering system. “This … approach can produce triage policies tailored to health care settings with specific triage needs.”

Controversy

It’s worth noting that Babylon Health, which is backed by the UK’s National Health Service (NHS), has flirted with controversy. Nearly three years ago, it tried and failed to gain a legal injunction to block publication of a report from the NHS care standards watchdog. In February, it publicly attacked a UK doctor who raised around 100 test results he considered concerning. And it recently received a reprimand from UK regulators for promoting misleading advertising.

The thoroughness of its studies has also been called into question.

The Royal College of General Practitioners, the British Medical Association, Fraser and Wong, the Royal College of Physicians issued statements questioning claims in a 2018 paper published by Babylon researchers, which asserted that its AI could diagnose common diseases as well as human physicians. “[There is no evidence] can perform better than doctors in any realistic situation, and there is a possibility that it might perform significantly worse,” wrote the coauthors of a 2018 paper published in The Lancet. “Symptom checkers bring additional challenges because of heterogeneity in their context of use and experience of patients.”

In response to the criticism, Babylon said that “[s]ome media outlets may have misinterpreted what was claimed” but that it “[stood] by [its] original science and results.” It described the 2018 test as a “preliminary piece of work” that pitted the company’s AI against a “small sample of doctors,” and it referred to the study’s conclusion: “Further studies using larger, real-world cohorts will be required to demonstrate the relative performance of these systems to human doctors.”

In this latest paper, Babylon disclosed that the chief investigator and most coinvestigators were paid employees.

Let’s block ads! (Why?)

Big Data – VentureBeat

Read More

AbleTo Slashes Medical Costs by Identifying and Treating Behavioral Health Issues in Patients with Chronic Ailments

March 11, 2020   NetSuite
gettyimages 157644612 AbleTo Slashes Medical Costs by Identifying and Treating Behavioral Health Issues in Patients with Chronic Ailments

Posted by Caitlin Winters, Industry Marketing Lead, General Business

Ailments such as diabetes, hypertension or heart disease bring a significant toll in the form of doctor’s appointments and emergency room visits. They also bring a significant financial toll for patient and insurer alike.

But when such conditions are accompanied by depression, anxiety or any other mental health issue, things mushroom. Conversely, for a patient who suffers from both an ailment and a mental health condition — what health insurance companies refer to as “comorbidity” — effectively treating the mental health aspect can reduce medical bills by as much as 50%.

That’s precisely where AbleTo’s efforts are focused. The behavioral health company has more than ten years of experience connecting people with depression, anxiety and stress to a nationwide network of 750 social workers and behavioral coaches to help payers identify patients who are likely to suffer from depression or anxiety in addition to other serious ailments, and offer a treatment path in the form of cognitive behavioral therapy.

Wanted: Scale

Yet, in order for AbleTo to treat as many such patients as possible, it needed to scale, and in order to scale, it needed technology that could support ongoing growth. For the first several years of its existence, AbleTo relied on QuickBooks as its back-office financial system, but by 2017, it was becoming apparent that a change was in order.

“QuickBooks was great when we were a very small organization,” said Frank Hunt, senior vice president of finance. “But as the company grew considerably and the complexity of our accounting processes also increased, we needed to move onto a platform that would allow us to have multiple subsidiaries, consolidate across multiple companies, and provide better visibility into and reporting on our business.”

When Hunt joined the company in 2017, AbleTo was moving towards that goal with a contract for cloud-based ERP software. But the company hadn’t implemented anything yet, and both Hunt and Alicja Czaja, who also joined AbleTo in 2017 as accounting manager, had previous positive experiences with NetSuite. By the end of the year, the company changed direction and moved forward with deploying NetSuite.

Three months later, NetSuite was deployed (“on time and under budget,” Hunt said) and two years’ worth of transaction data had been migrated — all with help from NetSuite Professional Services. Hunt said the team supporting the deployment was always available, and that only the company’s lack of internal resources kept the deployment from proceeding even faster.

New Platform Enables Growth Spurt

After going live in the first quarter of 2018, AbleTo got quick evidence that it had made the right choice. The company grew 100% that year and another 50% in 2019, and NetSuite has enabled it to absorb that growth seamlessly.

In addition to the core financial components of NetSuite, AbleTo has tapped additional capabilities such as prepaid fixed asset modules, customized reporting, and has integrated NetSuite with a couple of other financial applications it relies on, Bill.com and Expensify. All of these moves are paying off, as evidenced by the company slashing its quarterly book-closing process from 15 days to just seven days. (It expects to have that down to five days in 2020.)

Czaja said NetSuite is a vast improvement, and she not only saves time by not having to manually enter data, but she also is enjoying the ability to create consolidated financials and easily build customized reports. She also said that AbleTo plans to start using more of NetSuite’s revenue amortization feature early this year, as well as implementing the forecasting tool later in 2020.

“I know we can use more functionality,” she said. “Eventually, when we grow and expand out the pipeline, we’ll have more people using it and we’ll use more of the accounts receivable revenue functionality.”

Focusing on What Matters

In the meantime, NetSuite is allowing AbleTo to deliver on its mission. Hunt notes that AbleTo’s approach typically reduces the amount of depression, anxiety and stress in the patients it treats by 50%. What’s more, those patients with are then 50% less likely to be admitted to a hospital or have an emergency room visit.

With NetSuite behind the business, AbleTo will be able to expand that impact to more patients and insurance companies, without worrying about its technology slowing it down.

Learn more about NetSuite’s software for healthcare and life sciences.

Posted on Tue, March 10, 2020
by NetSuite filed under

Let’s block ads! (Why?)

The NetSuite Blog

Read More

The Cost of Our Health

January 15, 2020   Humor

A study published this week provides hard facts about the truly bad deal the US is getting for health care. Simply put, the US for-profit health system costs four times as much than Canada’s single-payer system. Even though the two systems provide roughly equivalent results.

Why? Because of a veritable army of administrative workers who play no direct role in providing actual medical care, and the cost of paying dividends to shareholders of insurance companies. These administration expenses add up to an annual cost of $ 817 billion, which is an average of $ 2,497 out of the pocket of every American man, woman, and child every single year.

It is bad enough that we pay four times as much for the same thing, but keep in mind that the high cost of US health care is killing people. It also hurts our economy because in the US many of these costs are shouldered by private companies. In my personal experience starting companies and working with other startups, this makes it much harder to start new companies or keep small companies running. And as we all know, small companies are the primary engine of economic growth, providing two-thirds of net new jobs and driving innovation and competitiveness.

Also note that this study did not include the time and energy patients spend dealing with health insurance companies. I primarily live in the US, but I have also lived in three countries that have single-payer systems, and the amount of extra time I have to spend dealing with health insurance companies in the US is staggering.

When people claim that a single-payer system will cost you money, they are simply lying.

Related

 If you liked this, you might also like these related posts:
  1. Universal Health Care
  2. Single Payer Health Insurance
  3. Single-Payer Health Insurance?
  4. Is This The End of the Health Insurance Industry?
  5. The Cost of Obstructionism

Let’s block ads! (Why?)

Political Irony

Read More

AI Weekly: Amazon plays the long game in health care AI

December 7, 2019   Big Data
 AI Weekly: Amazon plays the long game in health care AI

Today concludes Amazon’s re:Invent 2019 conference in Las Vegas, where the Seattle company’s Amazon Web Services (AWS) division unveiled enhancements heading down its public cloud pipeline. Just Tuesday, Amazon announced the general availability of AWS Outposts, a fully managed service that extends AWS’ infrastructure and services to customer datacenters, co-location spaces, and on-premises facilities. And it debuted in preview Amazon Detective, which helps to analyze, investigate, and identify the root cause of potential security issues and suspicious activities. That’s not to mention AI-powered fraud detection and code review products and an expanded machine learning experimentation and development studio, as well as a dedicated instance for AI inferencing workloads.

But perhaps the most intriguing launch this week was that of Amazon Transcribe Medical, a service that’s designed to transcribe medical speech for clinical staff in primary care settings. It’s scalable across “thousands” of health care facilities to provide secure note-taking for clinical staff, with an API that integrates with voice-enabled apps and works with most microphone-equipped devices. It supports both medical dictation and conversational transcription, with conveniences like automatic and “intelligent” punctuation. And it’s covered under AWS’ HIPAA eligibility and business associate addendum (BAA), meaning any customer that enters into a BAA can use Transcribe Medical to process and store personal health information (PHI).

It’s worth noting that Amazon isn’t the only tech giant offering speech recognition products targeting health care. Microsoft this year said it would team up with Nuance to host the latter’s AI software that understands patient-clinician conversations, which integrates with medical records. Rival Philips has long offered tailor-made automatic transcription solutions for health care professionals in public hospitals and small practices. And Google, not to be outdone, is collaborating with Stanford on a “digital scribe” pilot to use voice assistants during patient checkups.

But Transcribe Medical is merely the newest in a string of products signaling Amazon’s desire to enter the AI in health care market, which is anticipated to reach $ 19.25 billion by 2026.

The bulk of Amazon’s recent efforts have piggybacked on Alexa, its voice assistant platform that’s embedded in over 100 million devices sold as of January 2019. Last week, in partnership with Giant Eagle Pharmacy, Amazon debuted a voice medication management service that allows customers to set up reminders and request refills using their prescription information. April marked the expansion of the Alexa Skills Kit (the collection of self-service APIs and tools that make it easier to build apps for Alexa) to Covered Entities and their Business Associates (subject to HIPAA), enabling the publication of voice apps that transmit and receive protected health information. And Amazon partnered with Cedars-Sinai in Los Angeles to deploy an Alexa-powered platform, Aiva, that lets patients control connected devices like TVs and request nurse or clinician assistance.

That’s only the beginning of the groundwork Amazon has laid to date. Amazon last year made three AWS offerings HIPAA eligible — Transcribe, Translate, and Comprehend — following on the heels of rival Google Cloud. It also acquired PillPack for just under $ 1 billion, an online pharmacy that lets users buy medications in prepackaged doses, and it more recently snatched up Health Navigator, a startup that develops APIs for online health services. Notably, prior to the purchase, Health Navigator invested heavily in developing natural language processing technologies to document health complaints and care recommendations, which it integrated with its customers’ online health services, including telemedical apps and medical call centers.

Arguably Amazon’s most ambitious step was the launch of Amazon Care, a pilot health care service available to its employees in and around the Seattle area. The offering — which emerged from a collaboration between J.P. Morgan and Berkshire Hathaway to explore how to reduce expenses for their combined 1.2 million employees — currently includes both virtual and in-person care, chat and remote video, and follow-up visits and prescription drug delivery to homes and offices. It’s been speculated that eventually, Amazon Care might tap data from trackers like Amazon’s Echo Buds (which reportedly spot built-in pedometers) to inform wellness recommendations and spotlight trends.

Taken together, the developments suggest Amazon views AI in health care as a frontier worth pursuing — and perhaps its next major revenue driver. It’ll likely be years before the company fully realizes its vision for the market, to be fair. But it’s making inroads in a way that even Google — which is deeply involved with health care research through Google Health and its sister companies DeepMind and Verily — hasn’t yet.

As always, if you come across a story that merits coverage, send news tips to Khari Johnson and Kyle Wiggers — and be sure to bookmark our AI Channel and subscribe to the AI Weekly newsletter.

Thanks for reading,

Kyle Wiggers

AI staff writer

P.S. Please enjoy this showcase of a study from Nvidia (“Dancing to Music”), which is being presented at NeurIPS 2019.

Let’s block ads! (Why?)

Big Data – VentureBeat

Read More

Universal Health Care

August 31, 2019   Humor

Sometimes I think we fail to realize how absolutely insane our health care system truly is. This comic by Sarah Mirk imagines what it would be like if all public services in the US worked like our healthcare system.

I am perfectly happy to not insist on “Medicare for All” immediately, as long as we start to offer a “public option” where people have a choice between our current system and and a Medicare-like system. But our goal should be to move toward single-payer health insurance, the only question is how we get there.

The main objection I hear against going to a Medicare-like system with universal coverage is that it would raise our taxes. But as this article in the NY Times points out, we are looking at this the wrong way. We should think of the premiums that we (and our employers) pay for health insurance as taxes. After all, it is all just money out of our pocket.

Most Americans who have health insurance get it through their employer. I have started several companies and served as a CEO, and I can assure you that if a company didn’t have to spend the time or money providing health insurance — something that is a huge distraction and money sink from the company’s core business — then that company could easily afford to pay their employees a significantly higher salary. In fact, typically enough to more than offset the extra taxes that people would have to pay to support universal single-payer health insurance.

And there are other benefits that most people don’t even realize. For example, I have lived in three countries that have single payer systems, and in those countries insurance for your car is a small fraction of what it is in the US. Why? Because the biggest cost of car insurance is liability insurance to cover health care costs for you, your passengers, and other parties when you are involved in an accident. But if everyone’s health costs are covered by a single payer system, then there is no need for that insurance.

In addition to saving companies time and money, and saving us the premiums that are automatically deducted from our paychecks, a universal single payer system would save all the time that individual employees spend dealing with their health insurance companies and filling out paperwork. Every time I have lived in a country with public health insurance, the paperwork I had to deal with to get health care was far far less than it is in the US.

Related

 If you liked this, you might also like these related posts:
  1. Universal Health Care Merry Go Round
  2. Want to really understand what the rest of the world thinks of the US health care system?
  3. Republicans are fearful of health care reform not because it will be bad, but because it will be good
  4. Romney Praises a Government Take-over of Health Care
  5. Health Care Lottery

Let’s block ads! (Why?)

Political Irony

Read More

NHS creates AI Lab to tackle health care challenges

August 8, 2019   Big Data
 NHS creates AI Lab to tackle health care challenges

The U.K.’s National Health Service (NHS) today announced it’ll reroute £250 million ($ 302.86 million) in funds to create a new Artificial Intelligence Lab within a unit tasked with digitizing the country’s health care system, which it says will work to bring together academics, specialists, and tech companies to tackle “some of the biggest challenges in health and care.”

“We are on the cusp of a huge health tech revolution that could transform [the] patient experience by making the NHS a truly predictive, preventive and personalized health and care service,” wrote Health Secretary Matt Hancock. “It’s part of our mission to make the NHS the best it can be. The experts tell us that because of our NHS and our tech talent, the UK could be the world leader in these advances in healthcare, so I’m determined to give the NHS the chance to be the world leader in saving lives through [AI] and genomics.”

The NHS expects the AI Lab’s work will enhance cancer screenings by expediting mammograms, brain scans, eye scans, and heart monitoring, and that it’ll enable clinicians to better estimate drug, device, and surgical needs on the fly. Moreover, it says that the machine learning models it develops might help to identify which patients could be more easily treated in the community, and to identify those most at risk of post-operative complications or infections and diseases such as heart disease or dementia.

Ultimately, says the NHS England Chief Executive Simon Stevens, the goal is to upskill the NHS workforce so that they’re able to tap AI systems to automate routine tasks. Another of the AI Lab’s core missions is to inspect algorithms already in use “increase standards” of safety, making them fairer and more robust while “ensuring patient confidentiality is protected.”

“Carefully targeted AI is now ready for practical application in health services, and the investment announced today is another step in the right direction to help the NHS become a world leader in using these important technologies,” said Stevens. “In the first instance it should help personalize NHS screening and treatments for cancer, eye disease and a range of other conditions, as well as freeing up staff time, and our new NHS AI Lab will ensure the benefits of NHS data and innovation are fully harnessed for patients in this country.”

The NHS previously partnered with private parties to deploy AI-imbued services including Babylon Health, which supplies a chatbot-style app for triaging primary care, and Alphabet’s DeepMind, which recently anonymized data collected from NHS patients to develop systems that can diagnose acute kidney injury (AKI) and degenerative eye conditions. The latter collaboration proved to be somewhat controversial; the more than 1.6 million patients whose records were analyzed in the AKI-diagnosing algorithm’s creation weren’t asked for their consent, leading the U.K.’s Information Commissioner’s Office (ICO) to conclude last year that the NHS had breached U.K. law.

By bringing some of the work in-house, the NHS hopes to address those concerns.

“Today’s funding is not just about the future of care though. It will also boost the frontline by automating admin tasks and freeing up staff to care for patients,” said U.K. Prime Minister Boris Johnson. “My task is to ensure the NHS has the funding it needs to make a real difference to the lives of staff and patients. Transforming care through artificial intelligence is a perfect illustration of that.”

Let’s block ads! (Why?)

Big Data – VentureBeat

Read More
« Older posts
  • Recent Posts

    • Rickey Smiley To Host 22nd Annual Super Bowl Gospel Celebration On BET
    • Kili Technology unveils data annotation platform to improve AI, raises $7 million
    • P3 Jobs: Time to Come Home?
    • NOW, THIS IS WHAT I CALL AVANTE-GARDE!
    • Why the open banking movement is gaining momentum (VB Live)
  • Categories

  • Archives

    • January 2021
    • December 2020
    • November 2020
    • October 2020
    • September 2020
    • August 2020
    • July 2020
    • June 2020
    • May 2020
    • April 2020
    • March 2020
    • February 2020
    • January 2020
    • December 2019
    • November 2019
    • October 2019
    • September 2019
    • August 2019
    • July 2019
    • June 2019
    • May 2019
    • April 2019
    • March 2019
    • February 2019
    • January 2019
    • December 2018
    • November 2018
    • October 2018
    • September 2018
    • August 2018
    • July 2018
    • June 2018
    • May 2018
    • April 2018
    • March 2018
    • February 2018
    • January 2018
    • December 2017
    • November 2017
    • October 2017
    • September 2017
    • August 2017
    • July 2017
    • June 2017
    • May 2017
    • April 2017
    • March 2017
    • February 2017
    • January 2017
    • December 2016
    • November 2016
    • October 2016
    • September 2016
    • August 2016
    • July 2016
    • June 2016
    • May 2016
    • April 2016
    • March 2016
    • February 2016
    • January 2016
    • December 2015
    • November 2015
    • October 2015
    • September 2015
    • August 2015
    • July 2015
    • June 2015
    • May 2015
    • April 2015
    • March 2015
    • February 2015
    • January 2015
    • December 2014
    • November 2014
© 2021 Business Intelligence Info
Power BI Training | G Com Solutions Limited